In the digital era, platform-based businesses are the engines of modern commerce, powerfully reshaping how we interact, trade, and consume services. Think of Uber, Facebook, Airbnb, Amazon, and countless others—platforms that have redefined industries, disrupted traditional business models, and created immense value. Yet, in this rapid technological growth, there is an undeniable irony. While these platforms have amassed billions of dollars in revenue and propelled entire sectors forward, the value they generate is rarely shared equitably with those who are responsible for it—the users.

At the heart of the current platform economics, we find a system where founders and investors reap the vast majority of the benefits, while users—who generate the very value that powers these platforms—are often left with little more than a transactional relationship. But what if we reimagined this model? What if users weren’t just seen as commodities but were allowed to participate in ownership, share in the profits, and have a voice in the platform's direction?

In this article, we’ll explore how platform economics works today, why it’s inherently imbalanced, and how the future of platform business models could be more equitable, benefiting every stakeholder—users, founders, and investors alike.

The Current Model of Platform Economics: A Lopsided Structure

At its core, a platform business model is deceptively simple: connect two or more groups of users and take a cut of the transactions. Uber connects passengers with drivers, Facebook links advertisers with users, and Airbnb connects hosts with guests. As these platforms grow and scale, the value they create increases exponentially, mostly through network effects—the more users join the platform, the more valuable it becomes to everyone involved.

The core challenge with this current model, however, is that while the platforms themselves create tremendous value, they don’t always share that value with the very users responsible for it. Let’s break this down.

1. Founders and Investors: The Primary Beneficiaries

The founders and investors of these platforms are typically the primary beneficiaries of the value generated. When a platform is born, it’s usually fueled by venture capital, often in exchange for equity. Founders and their investors are the first to profit when the platform scales, particularly in the case of initial public offerings (IPOs) or acquisitions.

Consider the early investors in Facebook who bought in at a few cents per share and cashed out when the platform went public. They saw an astronomical return on their investment as Facebook went from a dorm room project to a multi-billion-dollar global enterprise. Similarly, Uber’s early backers have profited tremendously as the company scaled, despite the fact that its drivers—the ones generating the revenue—have faced ongoing challenges with pay and working conditions.

In these situations, investors and founders profit from the upside of the platform’s growth, leaving users with little more than a product to consume or provide for. The market capitalization of platforms may reach the hundreds of billions, but the users, who are the lifeblood of these platforms, don’t share in the wealth they help create.

2. Users: The Exploited Creators of Value

At the opposite end of the equation are the users—the essential participants who make the platform valuable in the first place. Whether it’s Uber drivers offering their rides, Airbnb hosts providing accommodations, or Facebook users generating content and engagement, users create the value that the platforms sell.

But here’s the catch: despite being directly responsible for the platform's value creation, users have minimal control or ownership. They provide their labor, content, and interactions, but instead of being compensated for the value they help generate, they remain on the fringes of the platform’s financial rewards. Take Instagram, for instance—its users’ data is what drives the entire advertising ecosystem, yet the platform monetizes this data, generating billions of dollars, with the users receiving none of the revenue.

Similarly, Uber drivers face rising costs (gas, maintenance) and deal with inconsistent earnings, despite being the ones driving the platform’s core service. Meanwhile, Uber retains the lion’s share of the profits, often leaving its drivers struggling to make ends meet.

In this current economic paradigm, users are not partners in the business; they are treated as assets, their data and services commodified to serve the platform’s bottom line. This creates a structural imbalance where the people who are most integral to a platform’s success are the least rewarded.

A New Future for Platform Economics: Shared Value and User Empowerment

The future of platform economics does not have to be a zero-sum game where users remain passive recipients of the value they create. A shift towards a more equitable model, where users can share in the wealth generated by platforms, would not only benefit users, but could also benefit founders and investors by creating stronger, more sustainable platforms. Here’s how:

1. Users as Stakeholders, Not Commodities

Imagine a platform where users are not simply treated as products but as stakeholders who participate in the platform’s ownership, profits, and governance. Decentralized platforms are leading the way in this shift. Web3 technologies and cryptocurrency-based platforms already offer models where users can earn tokens for their participation, vote on governance proposals, and enjoy a share of the platform’s profits.

Take Brave, the web browser that rewards users with Basic Attention Tokens (BAT) for viewing ads. Users are not just consuming the content; they are actively rewarded for their attention. In doing so, Brave creates a new paradigm where users share in the value created by the platform, not just the platform’s creators and investors.

This model could easily extend to all kinds of apps and platforms. For instance, Airbnb hosts could be granted tokens or equity stakes in the platform, rewarding them for their contributions. Similarly, Uber drivers could receive a share of platform fees or be granted ownership in the company, enabling them to benefit from the platform’s long-term success.

2. Profit-Sharing and Revenue Distribution

The future of platform economics could involve distributed revenue models where users receive a direct share of the profits generated from their activity on the platform. Imagine a social media platform where the revenue from ads is shared with users based on the content they produce and the engagement they generate. Instead of Facebook or Instagram pocketing 100% of ad revenue, users could receive a portion of that revenue based on the attention their posts attract.

Similarly, ride-sharing platforms could consider models where drivers receive bonuses or a percentage of the platform’s overall earnings, depending on their contribution to the success of the network. For example, a driver who completes a high number of rides or receives stellar ratings could earn a larger share of the platform’s earnings over time.

This type of profit-sharing ensures that users are not just workers on a platform, but rather co-creators of its success, thus incentivizing them to provide better services, generate more content, and remain engaged in the ecosystem.

3. Decentralized Governance and Control

One of the most radical shifts in the future of platform economics is the idea of decentralized governance. In traditional platform models, founders and investors hold the power to make decisions. But what if users had a say in how the platform is run?

By tokenizing ownership, platforms could allow users to participate in governance decisions, such as platform rules, feature development, and revenue-sharing models. This shift would not only democratize the decision-making process but also align user incentives with the platform’s success. After all, when users have a direct stake in the platform’s future, they are far more likely to ensure its long-term sustainability.

For example, a decentralized social network could allow users to vote on algorithm changes, content moderation policies, and even how advertising revenue is allocated. This decentralized control would empower users and ensure that decisions are made with their interests in mind, rather than just the interests of investors or executives.

Conclusion: The Path to a More Equitable Platform Economy

As platform-based businesses continue to dominate the global economy, it’s clear that the current model is unsustainable in the long run. While platforms like Uber and Facebook have brought about incredible innovations, they are built on an economy of exploitation, where the true creators of value—users—are left with little more than their contributions in exchange for minimal returns.

But a future exists where platform economics is reimagined. A future where users are stakeholders, shareholders, and governance participants—not just the product. This shift towards shared value could not only benefit users, but it could make platforms stronger, more sustainable, and more aligned with the long-term success of all involved.

When users share in the profits and governance, everyone wins: platforms become more resilient, user engagement deepens, and innovation flourishes. The future of platform economics is not about extraction, but about inclusion—a future where users are rewarded for their role in the platform’s success. It’s time to rethink how platforms work, and build a model where value is shared, not hoarded.

#wearemaany
‍